Trivelles Regency, Nottingham vs Similar Hotels

Rooms reported to have maintenance issues, such as cold temperatures and broken tiles.

Noise issues and uncomfortable bedding were noted, lowering the overall room quality perception.

Some good feedback on spacious rooms, but also noted issues with cleanliness and amenities.

Numerous issues: broken bedside lamps and switches, faulty sockets, leaking toilet, smelly or poorly maintained rooms and rooms smaller or different to photos — room condition is a concern.

Multiple complaints about dirtiness and maintenance issues, including blood-soiled tissues and unclean kettles.

There were some cleanliness issues mentioned, including unclean bedding and mould in the bathroom.

Several reviews mentioned cleanliness issues, including damp smells and dirty kitchen items.

Multiple guests reported unclean surfaces, thick dust and even finding dirty underwear in a wardrobe — clear and repeated cleanliness failures.

Location mentioned as not ideal for some guests, though others appreciated the central aspect.

Multiple reviews highlighted the great location, being close to the city centre.

Repeated positive mentions of the location being great and central.

Consistently praised as a brilliant, central location and quiet when facing the courtyard — a major positive across reviews.

Mixed reviews, some guests noted friendly staff while others experienced disorganization.

Staff were friendly and responsive, indicating a good level of service.

Numerous reviews praised the staff for being friendly and helpful.

Mixed reports but several guests praised friendly, helpful reception staff and early check-in; some criticisms about newer staff and communication exist but many experiences were very positive.

Several guests expressed dissatisfaction with breakfast options.

No specific mention in reviews, but amenities are adequate.

No specific feedback provided, considered standard quality for this hotel tier.

Breakfast was described as great in reviews; no major negative F&B comments were made.

Basic amenities offered but noted issues with breakfast quality and parking.

The hotel offers useful amenities like cooking utensils, though some improvements could be made.

Mention of limited kitchenware options and some equipment being dirty.

Air conditioning, good wifi and other modern conveniences were praised; some missing items (TV remote) and minor faults noted, but core amenities are strong.

Guests largely agreed on the affordability being a strong point, despite other concerns.

General opinion suggests good value, despite some complaints about cost vs. quality.

Generally good value where guests would stay again, though some limitations noted with self-catering.

Concerns over cancelled booking leading to extra cost for guests and misleading branding (not the expected chain) undermine perceived value.