Scandic Kødbyen vs Similar Hotels

Negative comments about room size and amenities, but generally acceptable quality.

Some comments on dark rooms and lack of storage options, but positive mentions of views and comfort.

Some guests reported disappointment with room quality, mentioning aging or worn-out interiors.

Rooms described as comfortable, modern, bright and often quiet with good beds and soundproofing; some issues reported (small rooms for some bookings, noisy AC or ventilation in specific rooms, TV glitches, minibar temperature problems).

Cleanliness was mentioned positively but had some issues, such as towels not being replaced properly.

Multiple mentions of cleanliness issues, particularly regarding room details and breakfast setup.

Multiple reviews indicated cleanliness issues, including dirty rooms and bathrooms.

Generally reported as very clean on arrival and well maintained (multiple mentions of 'clean', 'rent', 'rent overalt'), though some guests noted inconsistent housekeeping and occasional missed items (coffee cups, towels).

Multiple reviews mentioned the location being excellent, close to amenities and public transport.

Numerous comments highlight the excellent location of the hotel.

The hotel is conveniently located near key transport links and central attractions.

Many guests praised the location as excellent and convenient for sightseeing; a minority found it a longer walk to public transport (15–20 mins) or affected by train noise if windows opened.

Service received high praise from multiple reviews, highlighting helpfulness of staff.

Consistently positive feedback on staff friendliness and helpfulness.

Many reviews praised the friendly and helpful staff.

Staff repeatedly described as polite, friendly and helpful (reception and general staff praised). A few isolated service issues noted (restaurant staff unfriendly, less-welcoming housekeeping response), but overall strong service sentiment.

Good feedback on breakfast quality, but some restrictions on options pointed out.

Generally good feedback about breakfast options but some criticisms about quality on certain days.

Breakfast was generally well received and considered a strong point.

Breakfast frequently praised (excellent, family-focus Breakfast Club, good variety noted), though some guests cited limited options, required time-slot reservations, long queues and occasional dissatisfaction with beverage options (instant decaf).

Limited amenities noted, such as missing equipment like a kettle, which affected the experience.

Complaints about missing amenities like fridges and limited room service options.

Amenities met standards but were not outstanding.

Pool, gym and family-friendly facilities praised (pool highlighted several times); some operational limits noted (pool closed for a 2-hour window), and a few missing in-room amenities (no kettle, no shoehorn, robe/arrival information missing).

Several reviews indicated dissatisfaction with the price relative to room size and amenities.

Mixed feedback about pricing and the quality received, particularly concerning breakfast.

Guests felt that the price did not equate to the quality of their stay, especially with cleanliness issues.

Mixed sentiment on value: many felt the stay was good, but complaints about unexpected extra costs (parking significantly more than stated) and at least one reviewer expressing below-average value lowered this score.