Clayton Hotel Amsterdam American vs Similar Hotels

Rooms often described as comfortable, some spacious and upgraded canal-view/executive rooms; negatives include some very small rooms, small towels, and occasional noise from adjoining rooms/above.

Most rooms were comfortable and clean, but there were complaints about noise and a small bathroom.

The mattress wasn't very comfortable, and it was cold at night.

Rooms were often described as small and some needed better maintenance.

Mostly described as spotless in several reviews, though a few guests reported one instance of a room not being cleaned on time and one comment saying a room wasn’t clean/dark.

Most reviews highlight cleanliness positively, though some concerns about the gym and bathroom maintenance were raised.

The toilet wasn't super clean.

Several instances of unclean rooms and dusty areas were reported.

Repeatedly highlighted as a prime, central location (Leidseplein, near museums, tram, canals, restaurants) and a major reason guests chose the hotel.

Multiple comments praised the convenient and central location of the hotel.

The hotel was well located, close to trams, restaurants, and stores.

Multiple reviews highlight the hotel’s good location.

Multiple mentions of very friendly, helpful staff, specific praise for upgrades and a waiter named Carlo; staff reacted quickly to requests (e.g., delivering fresh towels).

Numerous mentions of friendly and helpful staff, contributing positively to the overall stay.

Staff were super nice, very helpful and friendly.

Staff were described as kind, helpful, and attentive.

Breakfast repeatedly praised as good/fresh and a la carte options mentioned; on-property food and bar also received positive comments.

Breakfast received high praise for variety and quality, contributing positively to the experience.

Breakfast buffet was very impressive and tasty.

Breakfast was rated positively, while other food options were lacking.

Good breakfast, nice bar and on-site dining noted; however several guests mentioned lack of air conditioning and mixed experiences with balcony availability.

Standard amenities noted, although there were requests for more variety in breakfast options.

Breakfast was very good with many options.

Basic amenities available, but limited options outside breakfast.

Value is mixed: guests appreciate location and upgrades but some feel rooms/beds are small for the price or that balcony pricing is a premium that isn’t matched by room size.

General positive sentiment regarding value for the quality of the hotel experience.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Mixed feelings about value relative to room quality and cleanliness.