
Le Parc at Melrose
Los Angeles, US
0.90 km (0.56 mi) from original
Compare similar hotels across guest insights, rooms, location, amenities, value, nearby attractions and suitability to understand the trade-offs before you choose.
Lodgegrid Decision Intelligence

Los Angeles, US
0.90 km (0.56 mi) from original
Rooms
8.7Spacious rooms were frequently mentioned, but some noted issues with cleanliness.
Cleanliness
8.2Multiple reviews mention bad smells and issues with cleanliness.
Location
9.7Central and convenient location highlighted in multiple reviews.



Los Angeles, US
0.52 km (0.32 mi) from original

What you may gain by choosing another hotel.
The London West Hollywood at Beverly Hills
9/10Petit Ermitage
9/10Chamberlain West Hollywood
9/10Le Parc at Melrose
9/10The London West Hollywood at Beverly Hills
8.9Rooms are mostly described as spacious and comfortable, but there is mention of outdated decor.
Petit Ermitage
8.7Rooms described as spacious and comfortable but some issues noted.
Chamberlain West Hollywood
8.3Rooms are spacious and comfortable, but some noise issues reported.
Le Parc at Melrose
8.7Spacious rooms were frequently mentioned, but some noted issues with cleanliness.
The London West Hollywood at Beverly Hills
7.5The property is described as having a smell of bleach and cleaning products due to old carpets, indicating cleanliness issues.
Petit Ermitage
8.2Issues reported with room maintenance and cleanliness.
Chamberlain West Hollywood
8.3Rooms were large and stylish, very clean, but musty smells noted.
Le Parc at Melrose
8.2Multiple reviews mention bad smells and issues with cleanliness.
The London West Hollywood at Beverly Hills
9.5The hotel is located in a tranquil area in the heart of Los Angeles, providing a perfect choice for guests.
Petit Ermitage
9.8Great location mentioned in several reviews, accessible to attractions.
Chamberlain West Hollywood
9.8Excellent location near restaurants and attractions.
Le Parc at Melrose
9.7Central and convenient location highlighted in multiple reviews.
The London West Hollywood at Beverly Hills
9.4The staff is consistently praised for being amazing and going above and beyond.
Petit Ermitage
9.7Many reviews highlight great staff and service experience.
Chamberlain West Hollywood
9.8Staff were very helpful, friendly, and accommodating.
Le Parc at Melrose
9.7Staff were mentioned as helpful and friendly, with specific positive feedback.
The London West Hollywood at Beverly Hills
—Petit Ermitage
—Chamberlain West Hollywood
—Le Parc at Melrose
—The London West Hollywood at Beverly Hills
9.5The restaurant and food options received high praise, especially the breakfast and romantic dinner.
Petit Ermitage
9.2Breakfast and food items enjoyed by guests.
Chamberlain West Hollywood
9.3Great food experiences noted.
Le Parc at Melrose
7.7Lack of breakfast and negative comments about the food options noted.
The London West Hollywood at Beverly Hills
9.4Amenities like the rooftop pool and gourmet dining have been positively mentioned, enhancing the guest experience.
Petit Ermitage
8.7Amenities like the rooftop and breakfast praised, but some complaints on bar/restaurant costs.
Chamberlain West Hollywood
9.3Great rooftop pool and restaurant facilities.
Le Parc at Melrose
9.2Positive comments about facilities like the rooftop pool, although some amenities were lacking.
The London West Hollywood at Beverly Hills
8.4While some reviews emphasize it's a bit pricey, they acknowledge the quality justifies the cost.
Petit Ermitage
8.2Some reviews mention high costs and additional fees.
Chamberlain West Hollywood
8.3Parking was deemed expensive, but overall experience justifies the price.
Le Parc at Melrose
9.2Some reviews pointed out high parking costs, which affected overall perception of value.
The London West Hollywood at Beverly Hills
Crosby, Stills & Nash Album Cover LocationPetit Ermitage
Crosby, Stills & Nash Album Cover LocationChamberlain West Hollywood
Crosby, Stills & Nash Album Cover LocationLe Parc at Melrose
Crosby, Stills & Nash Album Cover Location