
Compare similar hotels across guest insights, rooms, location, amenities, value, nearby attractions and suitability to understand the trade-offs before you choose.
Lodgegrid Decision Intelligence

Service
9.3Staff were very helpful and accommodating, with multiple mentions of excellent service.
Amenities & Facilities
8.8Facilities like the in-house restaurant and bar were praised but noted for noise issues.
No close alternative was identified for this preference.



Auckland, NZ
0.31 km (0.19 mi) from original

What you may gain by choosing another hotel.
M Social Hotel Auckland
9.4/10Hilton Auckland
8.6/10Mövenpick Hotel Auckland
8.6/10QT Auckland
8.8/10M Social Hotel Auckland
9.5Rooms are large, comfy with great views, though minor issues like smells were reported.
Hilton Auckland
7.4Mixed reviews about room quality, with some guests mentioning cramped spaces and old decor.
Mövenpick Hotel Auckland
7.7Some reviews indicated rooms were just okay or facilities felt dated.
QT Auckland
8.8Rooms were described as high standard and comfortable, though some noted lighting issues.
M Social Hotel Auckland
9.6The hotel rooms are clean and spacious enough with timely housekeeping.
Hilton Auckland
7.9Several reviews highlighted issues with cleanliness, particularly in the bathrooms.
Mövenpick Hotel Auckland
8.2Several mentions of outdated facilities and issues with room maintenance.
QT Auckland
8.8Clean and modern rooms as mentioned in multiple reviews.
M Social Hotel Auckland
10.0Fantastic location within walking distance to restaurants, sights, and ferry terminals.
Hilton Auckland
9.4Many reviews praised the hotel's convenient location near restaurants and attractions.
Mövenpick Hotel Auckland
9.7Repeated praises for the hotel's prime location near attractions and transport.
QT Auckland
9.3Great location close to the marina and city centre, consistently praised in reviews.
M Social Hotel Auckland
9.5Generally friendly staff, though some guests found staff indifferent.
Hilton Auckland
9.4Overall, the service received positive remarks with staff being accommodating and helpful.
Mövenpick Hotel Auckland
9.2Consistently positive feedback regarding staff friendliness and service quality.
QT Auckland
9.3Staff were very helpful and accommodating, with multiple mentions of excellent service.
M Social Hotel Auckland
—Hilton Auckland
—Mövenpick Hotel Auckland
—QT Auckland
—M Social Hotel Auckland
8.6Breakfast offerings were decent, but coffee quality was criticized by some guests.
Hilton Auckland
9.4The hotel received high marks for its breakfast and food quality overall.
Mövenpick Hotel Auckland
8.2Mixed reviews on food with highlights on breakfast but some inconsistency reported.
QT Auckland
8.3Food is unique with good flavors, but some found it expensive.
M Social Hotel Auckland
9.0Basic amenities provided; some suggestions for improvement, but overall satisfactory.
Hilton Auckland
7.9Guest sentiment was dampened by the pool being closed and limited amenities in some rooms.
Mövenpick Hotel Auckland
8.7Good amenities mentioned, though some guests felt more could be offered.
QT Auckland
8.8Facilities like the in-house restaurant and bar were praised but noted for noise issues.
M Social Hotel Auckland
9.5Higher prices in an excellent location; value deemed worth it by most guests.
Hilton Auckland
8.4While some found the price high for the value received, others felt it matched the hotel's reputation.
Mövenpick Hotel Auckland
8.7Overall acceptable value for a centrally located hotel.
QT Auckland
8.3Some guests felt the pricing was on the high side for the room size, but overall the value was acceptable.
M Social Hotel Auckland
KōrimurimuHilton Auckland
The LighthouseMövenpick Hotel Auckland
Eyelight LaneQT Auckland
Where the Sea Met the City