
Central Station Hotel Liverpool
Liverpool, GB
0.14 km (0.09 mi) from original
Compare similar hotels across guest insights, rooms, location, amenities, value, nearby attractions and suitability to understand the trade-offs before you choose.
Lodgegrid Decision Intelligence

Liverpool, GB
0.14 km (0.09 mi) from original
Rooms
8.1Rooms were spacious and well-sized, but some complained about noise and the mattress.
Cleanliness
8.1Room cleanliness was mentioned positively but noted issues with the shower.
Location
9.1Location is praised as ideal and central to various attractions.
No close alternative was identified for this preference.


Liverpool, GB
0.61 km (0.38 mi) from original

Liverpool, GB
0.14 km (0.09 mi) from original

Adelphi Hotel
6.6/10The Sir Thomas Hotel
7.9/10Central Station Hotel Liverpool
8.6/10Malacuna Liverpool
7/10Adelphi Hotel
5.0Below average: rooms are often described as tired and dated, with uncomfortable/hard beds, noisy street/bar disturbance, inconsistent fixtures (some bathrooms are new but many rooms feel run-down).
The Sir Thomas Hotel
6.8Mixed comments: some rooms modern and a good size, others small, dark, very warm or with a damp smell; bathrooms sometimes excellent but some cramped.
Central Station Hotel Liverpool
8.1Rooms were spacious and well-sized, but some complained about noise and the mattress.
Malacuna Liverpool
5.5Several reports of very small or tiny rooms, mixed dorm allocation (not expected by some guests), no TV in some rooms and basic furnishings — acceptable for a cheap stay but below standard for those expecting a hotel room.
Adelphi Hotel
5.5Mixed reports: some guests found rooms clean and tidy, but multiple reviews mention thick dust, an iron stain on clothing, inconsistent towel/linen changes and even reports of pests — overall below average cleanliness.
The Sir Thomas Hotel
8.5Mostly praised across reviews: rooms and bathrooms described as tidy, spotless and impeccably cleaned, with a few isolated mentions of a damp smell in one room.
Central Station Hotel Liverpool
8.1Room cleanliness was mentioned positively but noted issues with the shower.
Malacuna Liverpool
6.5Mixed signals: multiple guests call rooms 'very clean' or 'lovely and clean', but there are specific complaints about shower hygiene (hair on the floor) and lack of storage/hooks in the shower area.
Adelphi Hotel
9.0Consistently strong: central location, close to the station, shopping and transport to Anfield; many guests cite the location as a primary pro.
The Sir Thomas Hotel
9.4Consistently highlighted as excellent — very close to attractions, station and city centre; considered a major positive of the hotel.
Central Station Hotel Liverpool
9.1Location is praised as ideal and central to various attractions.
Malacuna Liverpool
8.5Consistently praised across reviews: described as excellent/perfect location for sightseeing, bars and restaurants; multiple guests highlight great central location.
Adelphi Hotel
8.0Generally positive: staff are frequently described as helpful and friendly, with repeat guests praising the team and willingness to assist.
The Sir Thomas Hotel
9.0Staff repeatedly described as friendly, helpful and brilliant; breakfast service struggled at times but staff were said to be trying their best.
Central Station Hotel Liverpool
9.1Staff were described as friendly and helpful across multiple reviews.
Malacuna Liverpool
9.0Generally praised: staff repeatedly described as brilliant, lovely and helpful, with 24/7 reception noted. One strong complaint about a receptionist's handling of payment reduces but does not overturn predominantly positive reports.
Adelphi Hotel
—The Sir Thomas Hotel
—Central Station Hotel Liverpool
—Malacuna Liverpool
—Adelphi Hotel
4.5Negative: breakfast is repeatedly described as limited in variety and not very tasty; some guests avoided breakfast altogether.
The Sir Thomas Hotel
7.0Polarised feedback: some guests praised breakfast as excellent/wonderful, while others reported chaotic service, long waits, missing items or cold/over-heated dishes.
Central Station Hotel Liverpool
8.6No specific mentions of food, standard quality for this hotel tier.
Malacuna Liverpool
5.0Negative feedback: 'the worst breakfast I ever had' and several comments about lack of breakfast or missing F&B offering indicate below-average experience in this category.
Adelphi Hotel
5.5Mixed/limited: attractive historic public areas, but practical amenities are lacking for some guests (no/poor air conditioning, inadequate windows for noise, some rooms missing bathtubs).
The Sir Thomas Hotel
6.5Shortcomings noted: no in-room fridge, no air conditioning in some rooms, weak water pressure, outdated hairdryer, and limited breakfast crockery/teapots in service area.
Central Station Hotel Liverpool
8.6Basic amenities noted, but some reviews mentioned lack of hotel facilities.
Malacuna Liverpool
5.5Limited amenities noted: lack of kettle, no TV in some rooms, 'no facilities' mentioned by one guest; private bathrooms exist in some rooms but overall amenities are sparse.
Adelphi Hotel
8.0Positive overall: several guests call it great value for money and report staying repeatedly; good for groups and location-driven stays.
The Sir Thomas Hotel
8.0Several guests called it good value or well worth the money despite some minor drawbacks (deposit hold, décor issues).
Central Station Hotel Liverpool
8.6Value perceived as good considering the central location and room size.
Malacuna Liverpool
8.5Many guests state the property is cheap, great value and 'excellent value for money'; however a single serious complaint about being overcharged tempers this positive trend.
Adelphi Hotel
Memorial of Renshaw Street ChapelThe Sir Thomas Hotel
Eleanor Rigby statueCentral Station Hotel Liverpool
ReconciliationMalacuna Liverpool
Roscoe Gardens