
Compare similar hotels across guest insights, rooms, location, amenities, value, nearby attractions and suitability to understand the trade-offs before you choose.
Lodgegrid Decision Intelligence

Rooms
9.8Comfortable beds and well-decorated rooms received favorable comments.
Cleanliness
9.3Guests mentioned the hotel was very clean and well maintained.
Location
9.8The location is noted as convenient with easy access to local attractions.
No close alternative was identified for this preference.


Cheltenham, GB
3.1 km (1.9 mi) from original


What you may gain by choosing another hotel.
DoubleTree by Hilton Cheltenham-Cotswolds
7.7/10Queens Hotel Cheltenham
8.8/10Beaumont House
9.4/10Malmaison Cheltenham
8/10DoubleTree by Hilton Cheltenham-Cotswolds
7.0Rooms were described as dated and noisy with issues in heating.
Queens Hotel Cheltenham
8.7Rooms were comfortable with a mix of historical and modern comfort.
Beaumont House
9.8Comfortable beds and well-decorated rooms received favorable comments.
Malmaison Cheltenham
7.1Reviews noted that some rooms were small, dated or poorly lit, affecting the overall room quality.
DoubleTree by Hilton Cheltenham-Cotswolds
6.5Several reviews indicate the hotel is dated, not clean, with icy bathroom floors.
Queens Hotel Cheltenham
8.7Room was clean and spotlessly clean as mentioned.
Beaumont House
9.3Guests mentioned the hotel was very clean and well maintained.
Malmaison Cheltenham
7.6Some reviews mentioned cleanliness issues with dated rooms and a bathtub that appeared unclean.
DoubleTree by Hilton Cheltenham-Cotswolds
9.0Location was praised for its convenience and atmosphere.
Queens Hotel Cheltenham
9.2Great location, ideal for accessing nearby attractions.
Beaumont House
9.8The location is noted as convenient with easy access to local attractions.
Malmaison Cheltenham
9.2The hotel has been consistently praised for its excellent location in Cheltenham.
DoubleTree by Hilton Cheltenham-Cotswolds
7.5Mixed feedback on service; some staff were friendly, but there were significant complaints about unhelpfulness.
Queens Hotel Cheltenham
9.2Staff were friendly and welcoming, and the service was attentive.
Beaumont House
10.0Automated check-in and check-out received positive remarks, but concerns about lack of personal interaction were raised.
Malmaison Cheltenham
8.6Most reviews describe pleasant service with specific mentions of helpful staff.
DoubleTree by Hilton Cheltenham-Cotswolds
—Queens Hotel Cheltenham
—Beaumont House
—Malmaison Cheltenham
—DoubleTree by Hilton Cheltenham-Cotswolds
7.0Breakfast was frequently mentioned negatively, though some enjoyed specific meals.
Queens Hotel Cheltenham
8.7Breakfast was delicious, but can be improved for temperature.
Beaumont House
7.8Breakfast options were limited, with suggestions for improvement.
Malmaison Cheltenham
8.1The food received positive reviews, especially during private events, although breakfast options were limited.
DoubleTree by Hilton Cheltenham-Cotswolds
8.5Amenities received good marks, though there were complaints about the spa's condition.
Queens Hotel Cheltenham
8.7Facilities provided included tea and coffee, standard for this hotel tier.
Beaumont House
8.8Limited breakfast options noted; however, digital check-in is appreciated.
Malmaison Cheltenham
8.1The hotel provides standard amenities for the price, with some limitations on parking.
DoubleTree by Hilton Cheltenham-Cotswolds
8.0Some expectations were not met for the price, although comfort was noted by some guests.
Queens Hotel Cheltenham
8.6Good value for the quality of service and facilities, standard for this hotel tier.
Beaumont House
10.0Guests found the stay to be very affordable considering the services provided.
Malmaison Cheltenham
7.1Some guests felt that the price was excessive for what was offered, particularly during peak times.
DoubleTree by Hilton Cheltenham-Cotswolds
Stocks and Whipping PostQueens Hotel Cheltenham
Remembrance Beds Imperial GardensBeaumont House
Gas Lamp BaseMalmaison Cheltenham
Nouvelle