Ramada by Wyndham Flamingo Water Park vs Similar Hotels

Rooms were outdated, issues with broken beds, and unpleasant odors reported.

While some rooms were noted as nice, others require renovation and had issues like air conditioning problems.

Rooms generally comfortable but some concerns about outdated decor and furniture.

Many guests noted comfortable, updated rooms and good beds, but there are recurring complaints about uncomfortable pillows/beds for some, low water pressure in showers, and occasional dirty rooms — overall slightly below the target.

Multiple mentions of unclean rooms and facilities, including cockroaches and inadequate maintenance.

Some reviews noted cleanliness but also mentioned issues like a roach and an overall not as clean expectation.

Mixed feedback; some rooms clean but issues with carpets and dampness noted.

Mixed reports: several guests praised that the hotel is 'clean' and 'well maintained', but there are multiple complaints about rooms being dirty, housekeeping not being done daily, and corridor/room smells from smoking — overall cleanliness is below average.

Location is decent, but not specified as a strong point; balanced to fit average.

The location was mentioned positively in several reviews.

Many reviews appreciated the proximity to attractions, restaurants, and parks.

Consistently highlighted as a strong point — close to theme parks, shopping and dining, and convenient for guests; location is a clear positive across multiple reviews.

Friendly staff mentioned, but overall service impacted by issues with breakfast and room cleaning.

Consistently mentioned friendly and accommodating staff.

Staff were very nice and helpful; many reviews highlighted positive interactions.

Generally positive staff interactions and praise for friendly/kind staff and helpful service, but isolated issues (lack of empathy from one receptionist, no follow-up on smoking reports) reduce the score slightly.

Consistently rated as poor across reviews, with limited breakfast options and disappointing quality.

Generic feedback about breakfast being not very good.

Breakfast quality varies; positive comments on some items, but negatives on others.

Breakfast is generally described as 'good' with many choices and appreciated as included, but repeated complaints about limited waffle machines, long waits and chaotic buffet service reduce this score.

Water park facilities were closed or not as advertised, disappointing guests.

Most amenities met basic expectations, but some lack of extras noted.

Good range of amenities including a nice pool and breakfast.

Good family amenities (pool, kids' fun zone, on-site restaurant) were praised, but parking problems, chaotic buffet management and security/door access concerns lower the amenity score.

Guests felt the amenities and services did not meet expectations for the price paid.

Overall, guests felt they received decent value considering the price.

Generally good value for the price; families found it worthwhile.

Several guests explicitly called out good value ('great place to stay for your dollar', 'El valor'), indicating the hotel offers solid value relative to price.