Regent Beijing by IHG vs Similar Hotels

Some rooms were described as old or needing repairs, but most were reported as spacious and comfortable.

Room size and comfort are well-received, although there are some minor issues noted, such as cracks on walls.

Rooms are described as beautiful, spacious and very clean.

Mixed reviews with some rooms being spacious but concerns over cleanliness.

Some reviews indicated cleanliness issues, including hair on bathrobes and insufficient room cleaning.

There are mentions of cleanliness issues such as the need for better cleaning services. The room maintenance could be improved based on some reviews.

There was an issue with thorough cleaning, including finding a long clipped toe nail behind the toilet door.

Issues mentioned with cleanliness, particularly regarding dusty rooms and tables at breakfast.

Highly praised for its convenience and proximity to major attractions.

The hotel's location is frequently highlighted as a strong positive aspect, being close to key attractions.

The hotel is in an excellent location, close to shopping malls and attractions.

Location is repeatedly highlighted as excellent and central.

Consistently reported as friendly and attentive in multiple reviews.

Overall, service is frequently praised, with specific mentions of excellent staff and assistance provided.

Staff was helpful but reception service was inefficient and poorly trained, leading to long wait times.

Staff consistently described as helpful and professional, particularly in assisting with lost items.

Breakfast selection and quality received consistent praise.

Food options are noted to be average, with a desire for more variety and better quality in breakfast offerings.

Breakfast quality was good, but options for western dining were mentioned as limited.

Breakfast quality was criticized; lesser variety and cleanliness issues.

Amenities were generally well-received, with particular mention of the business lounge and breakfast.

Amenities received positive feedback, particularly regarding the pool and lobby but lacked some maintenance (e.g., closed restaurants).

The hotel amenities are good, though there were comments about limited dining options.

Amenities are generally well-received though specific issues were noted.

While some mentioned the hotel is pricey, many felt the quality justified the cost.

There are some concerns about the value of certain dining experiences, such as breakfast and afternoon tea not meeting expectations.

Price seems high for the service experience, particularly at check-in.

Overall impression varies; some mention discrepancies with expected 5-star quality.