
Compare similar hotels across guest insights, rooms, location, amenities, value, nearby attractions and suitability to understand the trade-offs before you choose.
Lodgegrid Decision Intelligence

Rooms
9.7Rooms received high praise for their design and comfort.
Cleanliness
9.2Overall cleanliness was generally appreciated, though not highlighted in detail.
Location
9.3Convenient location mentioned in reviews, walking distance to town.
No close alternative was identified for this preference.




Cheltenham, GB
0.26 km (0.16 mi) from original
The compared hotels differ by 1.1 km.
The George: 0.14 km (0.08 mi)
No 38 The Park: 1.2 km (0.77 mi)
Hotel du Vin & Bistro Cheltenham
8.6/10The George
8.8/10No 38 The Park
9.4/10Queens Hotel Cheltenham
8.8/10Hotel du Vin & Bistro Cheltenham
8.5Rooms were noted as nicely decorated but had issues such as air conditioning and darkness.
The George
8.1Rooms on the smaller side and issues with noise from heating and plumbing.
No 38 The Park
9.7Rooms received high praise for their design and comfort.
Queens Hotel Cheltenham
8.7Rooms were comfortable with a mix of historical and modern comfort.
Hotel du Vin & Bistro Cheltenham
8.6Most reviews mentioned clean rooms but a mix of sentiments about discomfort with noisy rooms and maintenance issues.
The George
8.1The room was not properly cleaned, with residues left on the mat and only towels replaced on the first day.
No 38 The Park
9.2Overall cleanliness was generally appreciated, though not highlighted in detail.
Queens Hotel Cheltenham
8.7Room was clean and spotlessly clean as mentioned.
Hotel du Vin & Bistro Cheltenham
9.6The hotel's location is appreciated for its proximity to restaurants and bars.
The George
9.6Great location, ideal for theater goers and close to the main road.
No 38 The Park
9.3Convenient location mentioned in reviews, walking distance to town.
Queens Hotel Cheltenham
9.2Great location, ideal for accessing nearby attractions.
Hotel du Vin & Bistro Cheltenham
8.0Several reviews criticized customer service, particularly regarding restaurant reservations and check-out procedures.
The George
9.1Friendly and accommodating staff, though some concerns were addressed nonchalantly.
No 38 The Park
9.7Staff were frequently described as amazing and very helpful.
Queens Hotel Cheltenham
9.2Staff were friendly and welcoming, and the service was attentive.
Hotel du Vin & Bistro Cheltenham
—The George
—No 38 The Park
—Queens Hotel Cheltenham
—Hotel du Vin & Bistro Cheltenham
7.6Mixed reviews about meal service, particularly with breakfast chaos noted.
The George
8.6Breakfast was lovely, but the continental standard was considered poor.
No 38 The Park
9.2Food quality was mentioned positively for both breakfast and dinner.
Queens Hotel Cheltenham
8.7Breakfast was delicious, but can be improved for temperature.
Hotel du Vin & Bistro Cheltenham
9.1Overall satisfactory amenities, though air conditioning struggles were noted.
The George
9.1Standard amenities; however, the lack of a bar and a tight parking situation noted.
No 38 The Park
9.2Well-appointed rooms and charming dining area highlighted, but amenities were not extensively discussed.
Queens Hotel Cheltenham
8.7Facilities provided included tea and coffee, standard for this hotel tier.
Hotel du Vin & Bistro Cheltenham
8.5Perception of value varies with some feeling that quality did not meet price expectations.
The George
8.6Some guests felt the price was too high for the room size and condition.
No 38 The Park
9.2Considered one of the best hotels in terms of value.
Queens Hotel Cheltenham
8.6Good value for the quality of service and facilities, standard for this hotel tier.
Hotel du Vin & Bistro Cheltenham
Fauconberg VillasThe George
Fauconberg HouseNo 38 The Park
Wellington SquareQueens Hotel Cheltenham
Remembrance Beds Imperial Gardens