Green View Hotel Near Dartford vs Similar Hotels

Rooms were generally comfortable with necessary amenities.

Rooms were described as comfortable but some had issues like lacking coat hangers.

Mostly comfortable rooms and good sizes reported, with adequate shower rooms and toiletries; some guests noted dated rooms and at least one mentioned an uncomfortable bed, so room quality is slightly above average but not outstanding.

Rooms often described as spacious and well laid out, but issues noted with air conditioning (broken or absent), some dated decor and occasional maintenance problems (faulty taps, basic furnishings).

Mixed reviews; some clean aspects but issues like cobwebs and insects reported.

Some reviews mention dirty toilets and a need for better cleaning.

Mixed reports: several guests described rooms as clean and comfortable, but at least one review noted a very dirty carpet and overall disappointing room cleanliness, so cleanliness is rated below average.

Mixed comments: several guests praised clean, spacious rooms, but multiple reports of stains, mould/limescale, a hole in the corridor roof and bathroom/shower cleanliness issues reduced confidence.

Some complaints about the location being poor, particularly for families.

Reviews praise the convenient location near shops and transport.

Generally excellent for purpose: many reviewers highlight the convenient Dartford/Thames-crossing location and suitability for stopovers, though access can be challenging in evening rush hour and the hotel is near busy roads.

Consistently praised for proximity to Brands Hatch and good access to London; location considered a primary benefit for many guests.

Staff were reported as exceptional and helpful in some cases.

Multiple reviews highlight friendly and accommodating staff.

Consistently praised: multiple reviews call staff very helpful, welcoming and exceptional (specific praise for 'Susan'); a single note mentioned unfriendly/professional issues, but overall service is a strong positive.

Generally strong front-of-house service: staff repeatedly described as friendly, efficient and helpful (quick check-in, attentive on-site assistance), though there was at least one lapse in follow-up communication after checkout.

Limited food options and poor breakfast quality reported.

Breakfast received positive mentions, with a variety of options.

Breakfast is widely praised (plentiful choices, outstanding in several reviews) and evening meals described as reasonable, but some found the menu basic, chaotic service at breakfast, limited savory choices, or running out of items.

Food received mixed feedback: some guests enjoyed the breakfast and meal options, while others found breakfast overpriced and not exceptional.

Limited amenities reported; no bar and restaurant closed.

Amenities were acceptable but some users noted areas needing improvement.

Mixed: air conditioning and on-site parking are positives and toiletries are adequate; free WiFi reported but slow, and breakfast/food area is small—overall amenities are decent but have clear shortcomings.

Spa and pool were popular and a highlight for several guests; gym was underwhelming to some, billiards required payment, and there is no lift — a mix of strong and weak amenity experiences.

Generally seen as good value for budget hotel with clean rooms.

Good value was mentioned, though some guests had various issues.

Frequently noted as good value: multiple reviewers specifically mention value for money and the included/ample breakfast as a bonus; paid parking is a drawback but does not erase the sense of good value.

Several complaints about perceived poor value (expensive breakfast, surprise deposits/charges) offset by some guests feeling the overall stay was worthwhile; value is inconsistent.