GO2 Lancaster Centre Hotel by OYO vs Similar Hotels

Below average: several guests cited small rooms, uncomfortable beds/mattresses, overheated rooms during a heatwave, limited seating and some worn furnishings (stained carpet, plastic chair).

Rooms were comfortable but some had issues like noise or odors.

Some reviews indicate the room was not dark enough and some rooms felt small.

Rooms described as comfortable but with notes on size and maintenance needs.

Mixed mentions: several guests praised clean rooms, bathrooms and corridors, but recurring issues (stained/old carpets and at least one report of bed mites) lower the score.

Rooms were clean and well-maintained but some had lingering odors.

Multiple mentions of very clean rooms, suggesting a high standard of cleanliness.

Some mentions of maintenance issues with grout and carpets indicate a need for better cleanliness.

Very strong: repeatedly praised as central, convenient for train station/venues, with a large grocery store and nightlife nearby; many guests cite location as a key positive.

Excellent central location with easy access to shops and restaurants.

Great location mentioned frequently, contributing positively to the stay.

Perfectly located, with easy access to the town and amenities.

Generally positive: multiple comments call staff friendly, helpful and accommodating (early check-in, helpful at reception), with a minority noting an unwelcoming reception on one stay.

Staff were very helpful and went above and beyond in assisting guests.

Friendly and helpful staff noted in several reviews, indicating excellent service.

Guests consistently noted the friendliness and helpfulness of the staff.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Breakfast options received negative feedback, indicating room for improvement.

Breakfast was highly praised; overall food quality was good.

Notable gaps: multiple reports of no air conditioning, no USB sockets/adapters, no fridge, no hairdryer, intermittent WiFi and limited in-room toiletries; a small fan was sometimes provided but seen as insufficient.

Standard amenities for the hotel tier; parking was noted as an expense.

Amenities such as the breakfast baskets were appreciated, but some gaps exist.

Good bar and restaurant options along with additional facilities.

Generally positive: several guests explicitly state great value/price and good basic offering for the cost; one comment mentioned it was a bit pricey but overall value impressions are strong.

Generally good value but some guests felt parking was too expensive.

Price deemed high by several guests considering the amenities provided.

Pricing was noted as potentially high for the experience, but generally viewed as acceptable.