Three Cranes Serviced Apartments vs Similar Hotels

General appreciation for comfort and space in the rooms.

Mixed quality: some rooms described as clean and spacious, others as small, dark, dorm‑like or with poor mattress/fixtures and tight stairs.

Rooms were comfortable but there were issues with temperature control.

Generally favorable, with some concerns about noise from neighbors and limited shower pressure.

Multiple concerns about cleanliness, including hairs and dirt in various areas.

Mixed reports: several guests reported stained towels/bedding, dirty entrance and kitchen, and poor hygiene in some units, while others described their flat as very clean and spacious.

The room was clean, but a shower issue was noted which affected overall experience.

Most reviews noted the apartment was clean, but some minor complaints about noise affecting the stay.

Consistently praised for good location across reviews.

Very positive: repeatedly praised for central location next to the cathedral, convenient for tram and local amenities.

Great location noted multiple times, near city centre with nearby amenities.

Location highly praised, being central yet peaceful, with easy access to amenities and attractions.

Standard quality for this hotel tier.

Inconsistent: multiple complaints about slow or non‑responsive host, wrong check‑in code and rude responses, though some guests did get contact and assistance.

Friendly staff noted, but some service delays during breakfast were mentioned.

Hosts were described as welcoming and accommodating, with great communication noted in multiple reviews.

Not explicitly mentioned, but overall satisfaction indicates standard offerings.

Mostly self‑catering comments: limited direct F&B feedback; issues with kitchen appliances and fridge/freezer affected guests' ability to store/prepare food in some stays.

Breakfast was lukewarm and service during meals was not up to standard.

Not specifically mentioned, assumed to be standard quality for this hotel tier.

Amenities generally met expectations despite some missing items.

Below expectations in parts: several reports of limited or broken kitchen equipment (no toaster, faulty kettle, limited utensils, iced/freezer issues), occasional WiFi problems; some guests still found kitchenware acceptable.

Basic amenities present, but some guests felt that more could be offered.

Most guests found essential amenities present and sufficient for their stay, though more hot water could be beneficial.

Many comments highlighted good value for what was paid.

Generally seen as good value by multiple guests for the price and location, though a few guests felt severely let down when facilities were unusable and incurred extra costs.

Good value noted, but breakfast experience was disappointing which could affect perceived value.

Some reviews mentioned being overpriced and overhyped compared to expectations.