Royal Flower vs Similar Hotels

Small rooms with some reported discomfort from odor.

Mixed: some guests found rooms spacious and nice, while others described very small, outdated rooms with windows onto inner courtyards and cheap finishes; moderate score reflecting variability.

Some comments indicate issues with room comfort, such as old fixtures and uncomfortable beds.

Room quality was often noted as less impressive than expected from photos, with some issues reported.

Issues with shower cleanliness mentioned; needs improvement.

Mixed mentions: some guests said the hotel was very clean, while others reported unpleasant smells and unacceptable linen/bath kit for a 4-star property; overall slightly below expected standard.

Mixed feedback; several comments on issues like room cleanliness needing improvement.

Several reviews highlighted cleanliness issues, including a bad odor and neglected room details.

Convenient location near the station and metro.

Excellent proximity to the train station and metro (frequently cited as a key positive), though several guests note the surrounding neighbourhood feels unsafe or unesthetic.

Positive sentiment regarding the hotel's proximity to amenities and attractions.

Multiple reviews praised the convenient location near the train station and historical sites.

Staff mentioned as very friendly and helpful.

Generally praised: multiple comments highlight friendly, helpful staff and 'SUPERB' service; a few isolated reports of bored/slow reception or breakfast service issues but overall service is a clear strength.

Many reviews highlight friendly and professional staff as a strong point.

Staff were consistently described as friendly and helpful across multiple reviews.

Breakfast positively mentioned; good quality.

Breakfast and F&B frequently criticized (cheap breakfast, slow coffee service, plastic spoon, guests fetching cutlery), but complaints are about execution rather than absence of service—hence a moderate deduction.

Breakfast quality was highlighted positively, but some reviews indicated limitations.

Breakfast quality received mixed reviews; some items were not up to standard.

Good breakfast and facilities provided.

Several critiques: inadequate breakfast setup (guests having to fetch cutlery), lack of a proper bar/coffee corner, luggage room is a corridor; no major amenities praised strongly, so slightly below ideal.

Some amenities were lacking; specifically mentioned issues with the shower and noise from other guests.

Amenities like breakfast in room and a lift were appreciated, but some improvements needed.

Overall good experience for the pricing with some minor drawbacks.

Multiple guests explicitly stated poor price-quality ratio and questioned the 4-star rating; score modestly reduced to reflect perceived overpricing versus offered quality.

Price was seen as fair for the quality, though specific complaints on some aspects were noted.

Generally good value considering location and basic offerings.