
Compare similar hotels across guest insights, rooms, location, amenities, value, nearby attractions and suitability to understand the trade-offs before you choose.
Lodgegrid Decision Intelligence

Rooms
7.8Generally good feedback, with some comments on room size and comfort.
Location
8.8Many reviews highlight the great and convenient location.
Service
8.8Consistently positive feedback on staff friendliness and efficiency.




What you may gain by choosing another hotel.
Royal National Hotel
7.8/10President Hotel
8/10Tavistock Hotel
8.1/10Generator London
6.9/10Royal National Hotel
6.5Multiple complaints about rooms being very hot (no air conditioning), some hard beds and small/shallow shower areas; noise from street/inner courtyard disturbed sleep for several guests.
President Hotel
6.1The room had several issues including being small, not well-maintained, and not up to the expected standard.
Tavistock Hotel
7.8Generally good feedback, with some comments on room size and comfort.
Generator London
6.0Some complaints about room conditions and discrepancies from photos, suggesting room quality is average.
Royal National Hotel
8.5Multiple guests explicitly said rooms were very clean; housekeeping appears adequate overall.
President Hotel
6.6The room was very tired with peeling wallpaper and thick dust on window runners.
Tavistock Hotel
7.3Reports of cleanliness issues, including hair found in the bath and room not as clean as previous stays.
Generator London
5.6Multiple mentions of cleanliness issues, indicating that the cleanliness was below expectations.
Royal National Hotel
9.0Consistently praised as excellent/very good location (near King's Cross, British Museum, Covent Garden), quiet neighbourhood in some areas.
President Hotel
9.2Great location, very close to the Russell Square Tube station.
Tavistock Hotel
8.8Many reviews highlight the great and convenient location.
Generator London
8.6Consistently praised for its convenient location near public transport and attractions.
Royal National Hotel
8.5Staff described as friendly and helpful in several reviews, though one report noted a slow/irritated check-in for a large group.
President Hotel
9.1Staff were friendly, professional, and helpful, providing excellent personal attention.
Tavistock Hotel
8.8Consistently positive feedback on staff friendliness and efficiency.
Generator London
7.5Some staff were friendly, but a few reviews indicated poor service from certain members.
Royal National Hotel
—President Hotel
—Tavistock Hotel
—Generator London
—Royal National Hotel
8.2Breakfast buffet praised multiple times for variety and quality, though one guest found it boring.
President Hotel
8.6The breakfast had plenty of choices but was very busy and crowded.
Tavistock Hotel
8.3Good quality breakfast and variety, though some comments on individual preferences.
Generator London
6.6Mixed reviews on food quality; some praise for the bar, but concerns about breakfast options.
Royal National Hotel
6.8Key missing amenity: no air conditioning in rooms (frequent complaint). Positives include free water refill points and provision of ear plugs; limited in-room facilities noted by some guests.
President Hotel
8.1Standard quality for this hotel tier.
Tavistock Hotel
7.8Positive mentions of amenities, though some minor complaints about specific items.
Generator London
7.0Basic amenities are usually functional, but not all are described positively.
Royal National Hotel
7.1Mixed opinions: some call it good value for central London, others felt it wasn’t worth the price due to room issues (heat, comfort).
President Hotel
8.1Standard quality for this hotel tier.
Tavistock Hotel
7.8Value perceived positively due to the overall experience and pricing.
Generator London
7.0Paid amenities such as breakfast for an additional fee lessen perceived value.
Royal National Hotel
The Russell Square Bug HotelPresident Hotel
Richard D'Oyly CarteTavistock Hotel
Louisa Brandreth Aldrich-BlakeGenerator London
Mark Ashton