OnJ S. Lazaro Lisboa vs Similar Hotels

Rooms described as modern, nicely decorated and well equipped with kitchenettes; negatives include small bathrooms, cramped space for 4 persons or top-floor units, uncomfortable beds/sofa beds, and noisy/hard-to-control air conditioning.

Some reviews noted that the rooms were old and had issues, like hard beds and small showers.

Comments regarding old furniture and the need for updates and renovations.

Mixed reviews on room size and comfort; some found rooms small or with views of unattractive surroundings.

Generally reported as very clean and well maintained ("immaculately clean", well equipped apartments), but isolated issues noted: bed linens not changed for one guest, reports of ants and some apartments described as old/dirty.

There were mentions of old rooms and moldy smells, indicating cleanliness issues.

Several comments indicating a need for better cleanliness, especially due to old carpets and issues with water.

Some reviews mentioned issues with cleanliness, such as the bathroom not being up to standard.

Excellent central location close to services and near the centre; praised for being quieter while still convenient. Several guests noted the surrounding neighbourhood feels unsafe at night and Lisbon's steep hills can be challenging.

The location was frequently praised for being central and close to attractions.

Repeatedly praised as excellent and convenient.

Many guests appreciated the excellent central location close to transport and amenities.

Staff repeatedly praised as friendly, helpful and flexible (assisted with late check-in, communicated well, changed rooms when possible); a few service lapses noted around room-change follow-up and payment concerns but overall service sentiment is strongly positive.

The staff was noted as friendly, kind, and attentive, leading to high service satisfaction.

General positive sentiment regarding staff friendliness and assistance.

Overall friendly service, but some guests felt certain staff were unfriendly.

Breakfast consistently praised as very good/amazingly good; complimentary breakfast offered after incidents was also noted positively.

Food options, especially breakfast, were noted as okay, but could be improved with more variety.

Breakfast and food offerings received good reviews.

Breakfasts received praise, but some cleanliness issues raised concerning dining spaces.

Good on-site amenities like a sweet outdoor courtyard and solid breakfast offering; lacks certain amenities some guests wanted (no pool) and issues with noisy AC units impacted perceived amenity quality.

Amenities were reasonably appreciated, but some areas, like the rooftop bar, were criticized.

Included positive aspects of the pool and available facilities, but noted some amenities need improvement.

Amenities like irons and kettles were noted as lacking; some guests pointed out missing items.

Several guests explicitly called it great value (especially for families), noting space, location and breakfast justify the price, though some would not repeat due to comfort/safety or maintenance problems.

The pricing for the rooms was questioned, suggesting room for improvement in value.

Some reviews indicate a reasonable price for the central location, despite needing updates.

Good value mentioned for pricing concerning location and overall stay.