Hilton Garden Inn New York Times Square South vs Similar Hotels

Rooms are small and some were poorly maintained, but some guests found them very comfortable.

Rooms were described as small and occasionally uncomfortable with cleanliness complaints.

Many reviews pointed out that the rooms are small and not very comfortable.

Room size was a common complaint, particularly for luggage space, impacting overall room quality.

Several reviews indicated issues with room cleanliness and maintenance.

Several reviews mentioned cleanliness issues, including small rooms and some rooms not being clean.

Some guests mentioned that rooms were not cleaned consistently during their stay.

The cleanliness was generally positive, though some rooms were reported as small, potentially impacting the perception.

Consistently praised for its excellent proximity to Times Square and other attractions.

The location was mentioned positively as central and convenient for sightseeing.

The hotel is well-located with easy access to major attractions and transport options.

The location received excellent feedback, being central and convenient for guests.

Service described as friendly by multiple guests, though some noted inconsistencies.

Service was frequently highlighted as friendly and helpful by multiple reviewers.

Guests praised the staff for being friendly and helpful, despite some issues at check-in.

Service was highlighted as friendly and accommodating, particularly in the kitchen and overall staff interactions.

Feedback indicated cold food items at breakfast, affecting overall satisfaction.

Breakfast service was criticized; mixed feedback on food amenities.

Breakfast received positive mentions, but some found prices at the rooftop bar exorbitant.

Food quality was appreciated, but some variety was lacking at breakfast.

Restaurant and bar service were commended, though some issues with food temperature.

Amenities such as luggage storage and mini-fridges received positive mentions.

Standard amenities for a hotel in this location; rooftop bar available.

Amenities were viewed positively, although the breakfast area size was noted as a downside.

Price differences reported by some guests, but overall viewed as acceptable given location.

Pricing was described as high relative to the quality received.

Guests felt that the price was high for the quality and size of the rooms.

Value for money was favorable, especially given the location and included amenities.