
Compare similar hotels across guest insights, rooms, location, amenities, value, nearby attractions and suitability to understand the trade-offs before you choose.
Lodgegrid Decision Intelligence

Rooms
9.7Rooms were comfortable but some felt cramped.
Cleanliness
9.2Rooms were clean but some had issues such as marks on carpets.
Location
10.0Great location near town center and amenities.
No close alternative was identified for this preference.


Cheltenham, GB
1.3 km (0.81 mi) from original


The compared hotels differ by 1.1 km.
Malmaison Cheltenham: 1.2 km (0.75 mi)
The Portland: 2.3 km (1.4 mi)
Beaumont House
9.4/10Queens Hotel Cheltenham
8.8/10Malmaison Cheltenham
8/10The Portland
9.6/10Beaumont House
9.8Comfortable beds and well-decorated rooms received favorable comments.
Queens Hotel Cheltenham
8.7Rooms were comfortable with a mix of historical and modern comfort.
Malmaison Cheltenham
7.1Reviews noted that some rooms were small, dated or poorly lit, affecting the overall room quality.
The Portland
9.7Rooms were comfortable but some felt cramped.
Beaumont House
9.3Guests mentioned the hotel was very clean and well maintained.
Queens Hotel Cheltenham
8.7Room was clean and spotlessly clean as mentioned.
Malmaison Cheltenham
7.6Some reviews mentioned cleanliness issues with dated rooms and a bathtub that appeared unclean.
The Portland
9.2Rooms were clean but some had issues such as marks on carpets.
Beaumont House
9.8The location is noted as convenient with easy access to local attractions.
Queens Hotel Cheltenham
9.2Great location, ideal for accessing nearby attractions.
Malmaison Cheltenham
9.2The hotel has been consistently praised for its excellent location in Cheltenham.
The Portland
10.0Great location near town center and amenities.
Beaumont House
10.0Automated check-in and check-out received positive remarks, but concerns about lack of personal interaction were raised.
Queens Hotel Cheltenham
9.2Staff were friendly and welcoming, and the service was attentive.
Malmaison Cheltenham
8.6Most reviews describe pleasant service with specific mentions of helpful staff.
The Portland
10.0Self check-in process was easy, but lack of staff was a concern.
Beaumont House
—Queens Hotel Cheltenham
—Malmaison Cheltenham
—The Portland
—Beaumont House
7.8Breakfast options were limited, with suggestions for improvement.
Queens Hotel Cheltenham
8.7Breakfast was delicious, but can be improved for temperature.
Malmaison Cheltenham
8.1The food received positive reviews, especially during private events, although breakfast options were limited.
The Portland
8.7Breakfast was limited and not very fresh, with no cooked options.
Beaumont House
8.8Limited breakfast options noted; however, digital check-in is appreciated.
Queens Hotel Cheltenham
8.7Facilities provided included tea and coffee, standard for this hotel tier.
Malmaison Cheltenham
8.1The hotel provides standard amenities for the price, with some limitations on parking.
The Portland
9.7Basic amenities available, though some items like breakfast were lacking.
Beaumont House
10.0Guests found the stay to be very affordable considering the services provided.
Queens Hotel Cheltenham
8.6Good value for the quality of service and facilities, standard for this hotel tier.
Malmaison Cheltenham
7.1Some guests felt that the price was excessive for what was offered, particularly during peak times.
The Portland
9.7Good overall value, although breakfast service was disappointing.
Beaumont House
Gas Lamp BaseQueens Hotel Cheltenham
Remembrance Beds Imperial GardensMalmaison Cheltenham
NouvelleThe Portland
Pittville Gates