The Archangel,Restaurant & Bar with Rooms vs Similar Hotels

Several guests reported issues: rooms small or a little cramped, dark, often uncomfortably hot (fans insufficient), thin walls/noise from bar and neighbours, some maintenance problems (non-working lights, emergency light over bed, blocked sink).

Several complaints about room conditions, including noise and general upkeep.

Rooms were generally comfortable with some issues regarding cleanliness on certain stays.

A few complaints about heat and noise, but overall decent quality.

Generally reported as clean, but a few guests noted cobwebs by the heated towel rail and a blocked sink in one room — mixed cleanliness impressions.

Mixed sentiments about cleanliness; many mentioned issues with bathrooms and carpets needing attention.

Rooms were reported as clean, but some consistent issues with service affected cleanliness.

Generally clean but concerns about cold plates and small beds.

Multiple mentions of an excellent location, lovely setting and convenient for events (weddings) and town — strong location sentiment.

Consistently described as a great location, central and convenient.

The location was praised for being central with convenient access.

Great location near the town center with easy access.

Consistently praised: staff described as exceptionally friendly, helpful and attentive (help with weddings, thoughtful room touches like fresh milk, fans, provision of earplugs/eye masks).

Multiple reviews highlighted the friendliness and helpfulness of the staff.

Staff were described as friendly and approachable, providing a welcoming atmosphere.

Staff were friendly and accommodating, especially noted in multiple reviews.

Breakfasts were repeatedly described as excellent or wonderful; restaurant/dinner experiences were mixed for some guests but overall F&B sentiment is positive.

Breakfast was positively received, with friendly service, though it varied in quality.

The food received excellent reviews, especially for dinner and the bistro.

Breakfast was well-received, with a good variety.

Good basic amenities noted (fans provided, breakfast/dinner service, room facilities), though some specific amenity complaints appeared (wi‑fi failure in one room, limited beer selection, flickering lights, lack of chairs/tables in rooms).

Amenities generally met expectations, though some areas showed need for improvement.

Good amenities including parking and a bar, but some rooms lacked refreshing amenities.

Standard amenities for the hotel class, but some mentioned issues with parking.

Mixed to negative — a number of guests explicitly said it was not good value for money or were disappointed given price versus issues experienced.

Described as good value for the price paid, but mixed feelings about overall quality.

Guests felt the stay represented good value compared to service and comfort.

Good value for price considering location and services.